It's not possible. The problem is that lldb was dependent on order of includes because each header wasn't properly including what it used. So when clang-format reordered this, things broke On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:04 AM Christian Convey via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi Pavel, > > Would it make sense to address this problem by fixing clang-format, > rather than working around it? > > (Assuming the clang-format fix is relatively easy, and acceptable to > clang-format's maintainers.) > > - Christian > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I just committed another header cleanup commit, which makes lldb > > clang-format-immune ( = it still compiles after a full reformat) on > > linux. Other OS's are still likely to have some missed dependencies. > > > > However, when I tried running the test suite I got about 150 failures. > > Based on a sample of the errors, it looks like the problem is that > > clang format messes up the "// Place breakpoint here" annotations we > > use in the tests. > > Therefore, I propose to apply the clang-format to the lldb source code > > only as a first step. After that, as a second step, we can go through > > the tests and fix them up so that the comment markers are where we > > expect them to be. > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
