> On May 31, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev > <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:24:08PM -0400, Aaron Ballman via cfe-dev wrote: >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev >> <cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils >>> of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was >>> that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but >>> many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us >>> a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. >> >> Not everyone thinks git is a step forward. Please do not force people >> to use a "git-only" solution. > > Amen. > >>> 2. Due to SVN, we have a mandatory time sequence, so commits go first >>> in LLVM, then Clang (for example), and buildbots don't get lost. If we >>> use submodules [1], we can have a similar relationship, but in a more >>> explicit way, and the problem could be solved elegantly. >> >> I actually consider the monotonically increasing revisions to be a >> feature, but not sufficient to warrant a decision one way or the >> other. > > Has the situation with git-submodules and bisect improved at all or is > bisecting clang+llvm going to be manual mess? I found bisecting with submodules (in another project) far superior to the manual mess I have to do in clang+llvm today.
- Matthias _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
