On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:24:08PM -0400, Aaron Ballman via cfe-dev wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev > <cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Folks, > > > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > > that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but > > many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us > > a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. > > Not everyone thinks git is a step forward. Please do not force people > to use a "git-only" solution.
Amen. > > 2. Due to SVN, we have a mandatory time sequence, so commits go first > > in LLVM, then Clang (for example), and buildbots don't get lost. If we > > use submodules [1], we can have a similar relationship, but in a more > > explicit way, and the problem could be solved elegantly. > > I actually consider the monotonically increasing revisions to be a > feature, but not sufficient to warrant a decision one way or the > other. Has the situation with git-submodules and bisect improved at all or is bisecting clang+llvm going to be manual mess? Joerg _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
