================
@@ -23,9 +23,18 @@ def check_enum(self, suffix):
substrs=["Case1", "Case2", "Case3"],
)
# Test each case in the enum.
- self.expect_expr("var1_" + suffix, result_type=enum_name,
result_value="Case1")
- self.expect_expr("var2_" + suffix, result_type=enum_name,
result_value="Case2")
- self.expect_expr("var3_" + suffix, result_type=enum_name,
result_value="Case3")
+ self.expect(
+ "expr var1_" + suffix,
+ patterns=[f"\\({enum_name}\\) \\$\\d+ = Case1\\(-?\\d+\\)"],
+ )
+ self.expect(
+ "expr var2_" + suffix,
+ patterns=[f"\\({enum_name}\\) \\$\\d+ = Case2\\(-?\\d+\\)"],
+ )
+ self.expect(
+ "expr var3_" + suffix,
+ patterns=[f"\\({enum_name}\\) \\$\\d+ = Case3\\(-?\\d+\\)"],
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
Why can't we just use `result_value` here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69815
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
