DavidSpickett wrote:

I don't have the experience to know if enabling this globally makes sense, but 
I do have a future use case for it.

At a some point I want to be able to describe register fields as enums, and 
having the value as well as the name means you can match it up with the code 
you're debugging and create new code to match the value you're seeing. It's 
also useful for old debuggers on new CPUs where new enum values have been 
added, but we don't know the names yet.

What happens with values that don't have a name, do we already have a fallback 
for that?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69815
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to