RamNalamothu added a comment.

In D158971#4624001 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158971#4624001>, @DavidSpickett 
wrote:

> And this is being done for what reason?

This is a follow-up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D156086#inline-1518306 comment.
I see that most of the lldb unit tests follow this style.

> I seem to remember something about static and anonymous namespace in the 
> developer guide, please cite that if so.

Are you referring to 
https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#anonymous-namespaces?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D158971/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D158971

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
  • [Lldb-commits... Venkata Ramanaiah Nalamothu via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-co... David Spickett via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-co... Venkata Ramanaiah Nalamothu via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-co... David Spickett via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-co... Venkata Ramanaiah Nalamothu via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-co... Venkata Ramanaiah Nalamothu via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-co... Venkata Ramanaiah Nalamothu via Phabricator via lldb-commits

Reply via email to