clayborg added a comment. In D149213#4491594 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149213#4491594>, @bulbazord wrote:
> I'm curious to know why you don't try and implement some kind of > `TypeSystemRust`? I assume it's going to be a lengthy process, but eventually > you (or somebody else) is going to want to implement a `TypeSystemRust` in > some form and they'll have to revisit all of rust-specific things we've > tacked onto various parts of LLDB (e.g. this functionality with > DWARFASTParserClang). I suppose the question I'm trying to answer is "How > much do we add to LLDB before actually adding proper rust support?" Yes this is a work around until a proper TypeSystemRust is created. It works for most things now and this will help enums work using TypeSystemClang. > I was also curious about the test. I'm not sure how the test is supposed to > work here, is the rust source file actually built or is that just to show how > the yaml file was generated? There's no rust support in our testing > infrastructure AFAICT so I assume this just makes sure that something already > generated doesn't get broken in the future. The yaml generates the binary so no rust compiler or anything is needed for the test. I suggested to use a yaml file that has global variables with all of the enum types so we can test the SBValue system out to ensure it is working as expected. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149213/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149213 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
