kastiglione added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/ValueObject.cpp:434
ValueObjectSP root(GetSP());
- for (ConstString name : names) {
+ for (auto name : names) {
root = root->GetChildMemberWithName(name, true);
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
> kastiglione wrote:
> > JDevlieghere wrote:
> > > I don’t think this qualifies for ‘auto’ according to the LLVM coding
> > > guidelines.
> > I find the guidelines to be not specific enough. Case in point, this
> > section shows `auto` being used in range for loops:
> > https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#beware-unnecessary-copies-with-auto
> nit: mark `name` as `const` -> `const auto name`.
> I suppose it's ok if it's a copy since it's a StringRef and it's less
> expensive to make the copy?
yes I figure a StringRef is cheap to copy.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151813/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151813
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
