JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/examples/python/crashlog.py:515
def parse_images(self, json_images):
- idx = 0
- for json_image in json_images:
+ for idx, json_image in enumerate(json_images):
img_uuid = uuid.UUID(json_image['uuid'])
----------------
mib wrote:
> mib wrote:
> > JDevlieghere wrote:
> > > mib wrote:
> > > > What do we use `idx` for ?
> > > You're right, this isn't necessary anymore.
> > I'm really not a big fan of having very similar image lists ... may be we
> > could use the from the crashlog object and skip the first entry (since we
> > know it's the main executable).
> > What do you think ?
> Otherwise, we could hoist the main executable image from the image list and
> handle it separately.
I understand the concern. To be fair, I didn't check whether the main
executable coming first is something we rely on, but I'm pretty sure we are:
we'll need it to create the target. I didn't want to mess with that and risk
introducing a bug that way. It took me quite some time to figure out this was
an issue when parsing the symbol data. If we don't want to break that
assumption, there's nothing more efficient than keeping a second list of
references. I also think it makes sense to keep that in the JSON parser,
because the index of (parsed) image is only something that makes sense for that
format because it cross references images based on their index. That's not the
case in the textual or parser crashlogs.
FWIW this is the code that moves the main image to the top, invalidating the
image indexes of every image before it:
```
def set_main_image(self, identifier):
for i, image in enumerate(self.images):
if image.identifier == identifier:
self.images.insert(0, self.images.pop(i))
break
```
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D148172/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D148172
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
