aprantl added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/Function.h:439
   ///     The section offset based address for this function.
+  /// \param[in] generic_trampoline
+  ///     If this function is a generic trampoline. A generic trampoline 
----------------
Is the "generic" qualifier necessary here? If we later add support for 
trampolines with a jump target maybe, but without that this seems to just 
create opportunity for confusion, particularly for Swift where the word 
"generic" has very different connotations.


================
Comment at: lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepThroughGenericTrampoline.cpp:2
+//===-- ThreadPlanStepThroughGenericTrampoline.cpp
+//-----------------------------------------===//
+//
----------------
formatting


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147292/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147292

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to