kastiglione added a comment.

> But `allow_repeat_command` is a misleading name for that. It makes is sound 
> like if I don't pass that flag I won't get a repeat command.  
> `force_repeat_command` would be a better name

I agree. I did have some loose thoughts matching this, when writing it, yet 
somehow ended up with `allow_`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D143695/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D143695

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to