kastiglione added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:9818
+    if (ClangASTMetadata *metadata = GetMetadata(fun_decl))
+      return metadata->GetObjectPtrLanguage();
+  }
----------------
kastiglione wrote:
> aprantl wrote:
> > Couple of questions for my understanding:
> > 
> > 1. Do you see any opportunities for this to spectacularly do the wrong 
> > thing in an ObjectiveC++ program by guessing the wrong language? I suppose 
> > this just tries to do a best effort?
> > 
> > 2. We're not using the DW_AT_APPLE_runtime_language attribute because it's 
> > only attached to Objective-C classes?
> > 
> > 3. We're not using the DW_AT_language of the DW_TAG_compile_unit because it 
> > won't help us in an ObjC++ program?
> > We're not using the `DW_AT_APPLE_runtime_language` attribute because it's 
> > only attached to Objective-C classes?
> > We're not using the `DW_AT_language` of the `DW_TAG_compile_unit` because 
> > it won't help us in an ObjC++ program?
> 
> I am not sure how to answer these too. While this function is new, the logic 
> and this code path which calls `GetObjectPtrLanguage`, is taken from the 
> existing implementation. In other words, how the debug info is made use of, 
> hasn't changed.
> Do you see any opportunities for this to spectacularly do the wrong thing in 
> an ObjectiveC++ program by guessing the wrong language? I suppose this just 
> tries to do a best effort?

I don't see any obvious ways to get it wrong, but can't rule it out entirely. 
The way this change is implemented, there should be no way to have a regression 
– everything that used to work should still work. There could be some case out 
there where, in objc++, the wrong choice is made between `this`/`self`, but 
that would result in the same "variable not found" message you'd get today in 
that case (since the implementation should have no regressions).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D145276/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D145276

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to