labath added a comment. In D131998#3728016 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131998#3728016>, @fixathon wrote:
> In D131998#3727664 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131998#3727664>, @clayborg > wrote: > >> Can we use C++ comments instead of C comments? > > We can, and I'll make the change. Do you think it would be a good idea to > keep the coverity annotations only as C-style comments (comments for the > machine) to disambiguate it from the regular comments (comments for the > humans) ? The llvm comment style is documented here <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#comment-formatting>. I don't think we should be making exceptions for coverity comments. (also, I wouldn't want to be having too many of these machine annotations around the codebase). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131998/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131998 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
