clayborg added a comment. In D126259#3534997 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126259#3534997>, @jingham wrote:
> Don't allow setting signal actions by signal number before you have a process. I understand > We don't know what signal 20 is going to end up being till we have a process, > so allowing this by number doesn't make sense. I am saying that it would be a good idea to make sure an error is returned when you do try and set a signal by number before a process exists and make sure there is a test that covers this if it isn't already in the current patch. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126259/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126259 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
