labath added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/OnDemand/shared-lib-globals-hydration.test:4
+
+# REQUIRES: system-linux
+
----------------
yinghuitan wrote:
> labath wrote:
> > yinghuitan wrote:
> > > labath wrote:
> > > > Is this here because there is no portable way to create shared 
> > > > libraries in shell tests? Would it be possible to run this test on 
> > > > other systems as well if this were written as an API test (where we 
> > > > have a shared lib portability layer)?
> > > Yeah, that's one reason. Another reason is the name of the shared library 
> > > (used for checking global variables/debug info) varies across platform. 
> > > For example, it can be libfoo.dylib (Mac) vs libfoo.so (linux) vs 
> > > *foo*.dll (windows). I find it cumbersome to support multiple platforms. 
> > I'm not saying you have to go out of your way to support other platforms 
> > and their idiosyncrasies, but the differences in library names hardly seem 
> > like an insurmountable obstacle. We already have abstractions in the API 
> > tests (`self.platformContext.{shlib_prefix,shlib_extension}`) which exist 
> > precisely for this reason. There's no function to automatically construct 
> > the library name (you have to do the concatenation yourself), but I 
> > certainly wouldn't be opposed to adding one.
> > 
> > If it helps, think of it as courtesy towards other developers who may need 
> > to debug this feature when they break these tests -- that's much easier to 
> > achieve if you can reproduce the failure locally vs. just getting a failure 
> > email from a random bot (after you've already submitted your patch).
> > self.platformContext.{shlib_prefix,shlib_extension}
> 
> Ah, did not know their existence, thanks! Will add API tests for them. Do you 
> prefer to keep these linux-only shell tests or completely deprecate them?
> 
> 
If they're going to be testing the exact same thing, then I don't see a reason 
for keeping these around.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D121631/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D121631

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to