labath added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/OnDemand/shared-lib-globals-hydration.test:4 + +# REQUIRES: system-linux + ---------------- yinghuitan wrote: > labath wrote: > > yinghuitan wrote: > > > labath wrote: > > > > Is this here because there is no portable way to create shared > > > > libraries in shell tests? Would it be possible to run this test on > > > > other systems as well if this were written as an API test (where we > > > > have a shared lib portability layer)? > > > Yeah, that's one reason. Another reason is the name of the shared library > > > (used for checking global variables/debug info) varies across platform. > > > For example, it can be libfoo.dylib (Mac) vs libfoo.so (linux) vs > > > *foo*.dll (windows). I find it cumbersome to support multiple platforms. > > I'm not saying you have to go out of your way to support other platforms > > and their idiosyncrasies, but the differences in library names hardly seem > > like an insurmountable obstacle. We already have abstractions in the API > > tests (`self.platformContext.{shlib_prefix,shlib_extension}`) which exist > > precisely for this reason. There's no function to automatically construct > > the library name (you have to do the concatenation yourself), but I > > certainly wouldn't be opposed to adding one. > > > > If it helps, think of it as courtesy towards other developers who may need > > to debug this feature when they break these tests -- that's much easier to > > achieve if you can reproduce the failure locally vs. just getting a failure > > email from a random bot (after you've already submitted your patch). > > self.platformContext.{shlib_prefix,shlib_extension} > > Ah, did not know their existence, thanks! Will add API tests for them. Do you > prefer to keep these linux-only shell tests or completely deprecate them? > > If they're going to be testing the exact same thing, then I don't see a reason for keeping these around. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121631/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D121631 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits