JDevlieghere added a comment. In D121484#3378923 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D121484#3378923>, @labath wrote:
> I'm not sure what would be a good way to denote that the new argument > represents the architecture of the host running the debugged process, and not > the one running lldb. This isn't helped by the fact that some of the darwin > platforms use `GetSystemArchitecture` in their implementations (which, > afaict, does mean the lldb host architecture). Having at least a comment > would be nice. Maybe `platform_host_architecture` or `platform_architecture`? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121484/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D121484 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
