labath accepted this revision. labath added a comment. In D117707#3270072 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117707#3270072>, @jingham wrote:
>> I am a bit curious about the `__lldb` prefix. I'm wondering if there's a way >> to avoid having it, while still maintaining isolation from any type with the >> same name coming from the debug info. I'm thinking about putting it in some >> kind of an anonymous namespace or something... Does anyone know if that >> works? > > This will be the actual type of an SBValue, as is the case in other instances > where we've made up types, so users will see this type if they look closely. > So it should be clear from the name that this is just an artificial type lldb > made up. `__lldb_whatever` expresses that pretty clearly, but I'm worried > some reasonable looking name in an anonymous namespace would send users off > on a wild goose chase. Yeah, that makes sense. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D117707/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D117707 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
