clayborg added a comment. In D115073#3174376 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D115073#3174376>, @labath wrote:
> I don't think we actually disagree here. I'm aware of your use case (let's > call it "dynamic mode") for appending to a buffer. I agree it's useful and I > don't want to change that. What I want to remove is the other mode > (non-dynamic). Presently, this is the only mode, but we're not actually > making a good use of it. All of the existing use cases can be implemented > with a "dynamic" buffer. And the code would be much simpler since there is > only one mode to support -- one in which the data encoder owns the buffer it > is writing to and can resize it at will. Ahh! Gotcha. That I can do. Thanks for the feedback, I will post an update shortly! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115073/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115073 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
