mstorsjo added a comment. In D109777#3014644 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109777#3014644>, @labath wrote:
> Sorry about the delay. I think this is fine, though I would like to encourage > (*wink, wing, nudge, nudge*) someone to finish the lldb-server migration. > We're in a pretty bad situation, when it comes to windows right now, as we > have two process plugin implementations *and* two pdb readers, and both (all > four) of them are an active source of pain (see D109834 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109834> for the other one). Yup, I clearly agree on that. Unfortunately I don't think I can put up the overall architecting work on that right now, to look through the big picture and see what's missing and what needs to be taken care of, to move forward with dropping the old one. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D109777/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109777 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
