omjavaid added a comment. In D92063#2417948 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D92063#2417948>, @mgorny wrote:
> I disagree. Since we're repeating gdb protocol, it would be nice to use > offsets consistent with the gdb protocol, even if it means some extra > padding. I do realize that this is broken right now and not trivially fixable > but I don't think we should make things worse. I dont understand your disagreement. If you look at the current update of this patch, this is exactly what we are doing i-e Making offsets consistent with GDB protocol. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D92063/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D92063 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
