labath added a comment. <drive-by> It sounds like that could be an artefact from how we parse function types from dwarf. I haven't checked if that's what happens in this particular case, but I know that we parse function types by just taking the function DIE (which describes the whole function, not just its type) and let the generic ParseTypeFromDWARF function loose on it. It could be that this function picks up the DW_AT_name attribute from there (which is the function name in this case, but for other kinds of types it would actually be the type name). We could probably change that function to ignore the DW_AT_name for functions, though it's not clear to me whether the current behavior has any adverse effects (the final type name seems to come out alright...) </drive-by>
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D88483/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D88483 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
