clayborg added a comment. In D87868#2337537 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87868#2337537>, @aadsm wrote:
> Should I still go ahead with this since @labath implemented the memory > allocation on lldb-server? yes! It might be best to move this lookup functionality into lldb_private::Target so other bits of code that try to call a function directory can benefit. But we don't need to do that for this patch if you don't have time as there are not too many locations that do this. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87868/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87868 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
