labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Yes, looks good. It might not be unreasonable to add asserts to these functions
too, as I don't think we should ever have a register that doesn't belong to any
register set.
================
Comment at:
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/NetBSD/NativeRegisterContextNetBSD_x86_64.cpp:408-431
+ else if (reg_num >= k_first_fpr_i386 && reg_num <= k_last_fpr_i386)
return FPRegSet;
- else if (reg_num <= k_last_avx_i386)
+ else if (reg_num >= k_first_avx_i386 && reg_num <= k_last_avx_i386)
return XStateRegSet; // AVX
- else if (reg_num <= lldb_dr7_i386)
+ else if (reg_num >= k_first_mpxr_i386 && reg_num <= k_last_mpxr_i386)
+ return -1; // MPXR
+ else if (reg_num >= k_first_mpxr_i386 && reg_num <= k_last_mpxc_i386)
----------------
Could you also remove all of these else's while you're in there, as per
<http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#don-t-use-else-after-a-return>.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88682/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88682
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
