mgorny added a comment. In D88682#2307911 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88682#2307911>, @labath wrote:
> It sounds like the assertion could be useful (to detect the missing > translations). Under what circumstances can an unknown register make its way > to this function? How did you run into this code in the first place? Very good question. I've ran into it because it crashed under me. But now I see that x86 variant of `NativeRegisterContextNetBSD_x86_64::GetSetForNativeRegNum()` doesn't handle mpx*, so they fall into wrong regsets. I suppose I should change the conditions to check both lower and upper bound of each group. Thanks! CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D88682/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D88682 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
