aprantl accepted this revision. aprantl added a comment. > I am all for this, because makes lldb code more consistent with llvm (llvm > used to have a LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION macro, but it was removed as soon as > c++11 came into being).
That argument makes sense to me. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D80543/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D80543 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
