jarin added a comment. In D73191#1841372 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73191#1841372>, @labath wrote:
> (I mean, if there is a real benefit to having some queries return only > non-methods, then we can certainly do something like that as well, but that > should be handled differently -- either we can create a new query mode, or > change the behavior (and name?) of eFunctionNameTypeFull across the board). No, I was confused; this simpler solution works for us just fine. I agree with you and I like that the indexed case is the same as the manual-index one now. If you are happy with the patch, could you land it for me? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73191/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73191 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
