labath added a comment. This doesn't sound right. Will that mean we won't be able to find a method even if we search for it by its proper full mangled name (e.g. `_ZZ5ffbarvEN4sbaz3fooEv` in this case)?
A better heuristic might be to check for DW_AT_linkage_name, and if the DIE has it, then only accept the DIE if the linkage name matches the search query exactly. (We still need to let the DIEs without a linkage name through because `extern "C"` functions don't have those). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73191/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73191 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
