devnexen added a comment. In D68723#1703098 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68723#1703098>, @MaskRay wrote:
> In D68723#1703051 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68723#1703051>, @devnexen wrote: > > > LGTM otherwise. > > > I don't think this change should be reverted. It can just be repaired by > adding some `(void)!xxx;` In D68723#1703098 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68723#1703098>, @MaskRay wrote: > In D68723#1703051 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68723#1703051>, @devnexen wrote: > > > LGTM otherwise. > > > I don't think this change should be reverted. It can just be repaired by > adding some `(void)!xxx;` I would prefer this approach indeed but either way I m in that s a real issue at the moment since LLVM runtime check is on in the FreeBSD's system. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68723/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68723 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
