labath added a comment. I don't think having Expected<T> members is a reasonable thing to do. If we want to keep the notion of validity explicit (which is consistent with the direction lldb is moving in), then I think the members should be Optional<T>. The initialization code can take the Expected<T> result, do something with the error, and then emplace the result into the Optional<T> member in case of success.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68723/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68723 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
