jingham marked 4 inline comments as done.
jingham added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/include/lldb/Target/ThreadPlanPython.h:35
+ ThreadPlanPython(Thread &thread, const char *class_name,
+ StructuredDataImpl *args_data);
~ThreadPlanPython() override;
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> Why do we need the StructuredDataImpl and not the StructuredData?
I figured out that I had to do it this way when I implemented the same feature
as part of the ScriptedBreakpointResolvers. This change is largely copied from
that. But I don't remember why now.
I'll go back and figure that out again if you are really curious, but since
this is following a successful precedent, I'd rather not do that right now...
================
Comment at: lldb/source/API/SBThreadPlan.cpp:409
+
+ if (m_opaque_sp) {
+ Status plan_status;
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> Swap this and have an early return?
Every other function in this file is written this way. I don't want to fix
them piecemeal, and doing them all here would make this commit too hard to read.
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68366/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68366
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
