shafik added a comment.
In D68130#1686549 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68130#1686549>, @jingham wrote:
> ....
> IIRC, it is because we can't count on which artificial functions get
> generated in the debug information in any given CU. It depends on what gets
> used. If we write artificial functions into the AST it makes it harder to
> unique instances of the class. And it doesn't matter whether we do or not
> because the compiler will generate them into the Scratch Context when it
> needs them.
That makes sense and it holds up to some basic experiments.
@teemperor you should add a detailed comment to note that is why we skip
artificial memebers.
This is a quick examples where it does not generate the constructor:
struct Foo {
// Triggers that we emit an artificial constructor for Foo.
virtual ~Foo() = default;
};
void f( Foo &f) {
}
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68130/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68130
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
