labath added a comment. In D63165#1591665 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63165#1591665>, @amccarth wrote:
> I'm trying to think through the implications of this > always-use-an-lldb-server approach on cross-platform postmortem debugging. > I'll have to do some studying, but I guess this patch doesn't change anything > in that regard. I think the implications of this are zero. In the post mortem case we would still create an (in-process) instance of ProcessMinidump, and it work the the same way as it does now. Just like we create a ProcessElfCore for opening linux core files even though we always use lldb-server (via ProcessGdbRemote) for live debugging. Pretty much nothing of what lldb-server does is useful for debugging core files anyway. (Though I have had some ideas about creating a mock lldb-server operating on core files for the purposes of testing lldb.) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D63165/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D63165 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
