aprantl accepted this revision.
aprantl added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Seems plausible.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2472
+ flags |= eHandleCommandFlagPrintErrors;
+ } else if (m_command_source_flags.back() & eHandleCommandFlagPrintErrors) {
+ flags |= eHandleCommandFlagPrintErrors;
----------------
Is `m_command_source_flags.empty() ||
Flags(m_command_source_flags.back()).Test(eHandleCommandFlagPrintErrors)`
better? Not sure.
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61579/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61579
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
