teemperor added a comment.

In D61440#1488424 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440#1488424>, @kwk wrote:

> In D61440#1488174 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440#1488174>, @teemperor wrote:
>
> > LGTM module some minor code style issues (You removed some `virtual`s but 
> > didn't fix the indentation of the parameters on the next line, see the 
> > inline comments for examples).
>
>
> @teemperor I would have loved to use clang-format for this but apparently the 
> LLDB code is still manually formatted. It would be a bliss to just use the 
> LLVM clang-format style and never ever talk about "style" again.


I assume you mean running clang-format manually on each file? If yes, then 
check out git-clang-format 
<https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/master/tools/clang-format/git-clang-format>
 which works just fine in these situations.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to