friss added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D48393#1245049, @clayborg wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D48393#1244649, @labath wrote: > > > I agree with Greg that it would be best to restrict things such that there > > is only one instance of parsing going on at any given time for a single > > module. I think this was pretty much the state we reached when this thread > > fizzled out the last time (there are some extra emails that are not showing > > in phabricator history, the interesting ones start around here: > > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/Week-of-Mon-20180618/041937.html). > > I think the main part that needed to be resolved is whether we need to go > > anything special when resolving debug info references *between* modules > > (e.g. to prevent A/B deadlocks). > > > We don't have to worry about references between modules as no module loads > _ANY_ debug info from another module. What about -gmodules? I don't remember where the module debug info is stored, I think it is not shared so your statement would conceptually hold, but I'm not sure anymore. https://reviews.llvm.org/D48393 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
