> On Aug 8, 2018, at 8:40 AM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > Ok sounds good then, mostly just wanted to make sure you weren't re-inventing > something that already existed :) Do you plan to publish this on the VSCode > marketplace?
I would like to. Not sure how this works with native binaries as most VSCode plug-ins are typescript that can be recompiled on the fly on each system. If they do allow native plugins, then yes. > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:38 AM Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com > <mailto:clayb...@gmail.com>> wrote: > It is a different protocol. The LLDB MI plugin didn't work very well as was > quite flaky when I tested it a while back. Then I grabbed the CodeLLDB plugin > by Vadim Chugunov and it worked very well. When I looked more closely at this > plugin, it was using a javascript/typescript plug-in to launch a LLDB > instance and then ran a python script that received all of the javascript > packets from the javascript/typescript based plug-in and ran the debug > session. It worked very well and was rock solid stable. So I then created > this plug-in for Nuclide for use at Facebook as they switched all of the > debugging plug-in over to use the VSCode debug adaptor protocols. It works > event better than the CodeLLDB plugin with Visual Studio Code and it also > doesn't stop you from using the python interpreter. The issue I had with the > CodeLLDB is that is uses the python interpreter to run the debug session thus > it isn't available to you as a LLDB user. > > So long story short: our IDE at Facebook uses the VSCode protocol, MI is > clunky and doesn't work that well and was flaky, so this tool was created. > This also provides a really nice way to do remote debugging where the > lldb-vscode is run remotely on other systems. This removes the need for > copying files from a remote host up onto the system that is doing the > debugging. > > Greg > >> On Aug 8, 2018, at 8:30 AM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com >> <mailto:ztur...@google.com>> wrote: >> >> How does this differ from VS Code's builtin LLDB MI support? >> >> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:15 AM Pavel Labath via Phabricator >> <revi...@reviews.llvm.org <mailto:revi...@reviews.llvm.org>> wrote: >> labath added a comment. >> >> To end things on a positive note: I think the test coverage is pretty good >> (I'm sure somebody will suggest switching to lit), and I think a VS code >> plugin would be a great addition to lldb. >> >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D50365 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D50365> >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
