kastiglione added a comment. Thanks @jingham.
> if the `IOHandlerDelegate` could say whether it wants to be notified for > `IOHandlerActivated` when non-interactive (like have a > "`ShouldNotifyWhenNonInteractive`" method), and then the `IOHandler` could > dispatch it or not based on the response to that method So the "`ShouldNotifyWhenNonInteractive`" would only control whether `IOHandlerActivated` is called, not any of the other `IOHandlerDelegate` methods? What do you think about adding a `IOHandlerActivatedInteractively`delegate method? This could be called in addition to `IOHandlerActivatedInteractively`, but only for interactive IO? https://reviews.llvm.org/D48752 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
