aprantl added a comment. This patch is adding new overloads to SBAPI calls that don't return an SBError, such as:
// Old: void StepOutOfFrame(SBFrame &frame); // New: void StepOutOfFrame(SBFrame &frame, SBError &error); I wonder if it would be easier to use and more consistent with the rest of the API if we instead added an overload that returns an SBError, like this: // New: SBError StepOutOfFrameWithError(SBFrame &frame); // Alternative names that are just as ugly. SBError StepOutOfFrameE(SBFrame &frame); SBError StepOutOfFrame2(SBFrame &frame); @clayborg, @jingham: What do you think? https://reviews.llvm.org/D47991 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
