aprantl added a comment. > If we're not able to come up with a command to make lldb-mi wait until the > target stops (maybe there is one already? I know very little about lldb-mi), > we may have to revisit the whole testing strategy...
If one doesn't exist then I think it would be reasonable to invent one. Handling an additional command that is used in testing only should not break any existing clients. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D46588 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
