On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:11 AM Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> JDevlieghere added a comment. > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45215#1056917, @zturner wrote: > > > I haven’t had time to look at this in detail yet, but when I originally > had > > this idea I thought we would use lit’s discovery mechanism to find all > .py > > files, and then invoke them using dotest.py in single process mode with > a > > path to a specific file. > > > Assuming we can work around the problem of not every `.py` file being a > test (by filtering the `Test` prefix), would there be a way to > differentiate the different test within a single file? > Would we need to? dotest will just run all the tests in a single file. I can see how it might be desirable as an end state, but not necessarily as an incremental step.
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
