JDevlieghere added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45215#1056917, @zturner wrote:
> I haven’t had time to look at this in detail yet, but when I originally had > this idea I thought we would use lit’s discovery mechanism to find all .py > files, and then invoke them using dotest.py in single process mode with a > path to a specific file. Assuming we can work around the problem of not every `.py` file being a test (by filtering the `Test` prefix), would there be a way to differentiate the different test within a single file? > Why do we need run lines? With a custom test format these would no longer be needed. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45215 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
