mgorny added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41725#970926, @labath wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41725#969388, @mgorny wrote:
>
> > I was talking of:
> >
> >   source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp
> >   source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunicationClient.cpp
>
>
> Ah, right. These uses were introduced before we developed a preference for 
> llvm primitives. That said, I see a lot of compression stuff there, but I 
> don't see mention of zlib directly.


In the first of those files there are two `HAVE_LIBZ` conditionals that use 
zlib. There's also `HAVE_LIBCOMPRESSION` for the other library, I suppose it's 
relevant to Darwin.

Therefore, I have three questions:

1. Should we add a separate check/switch for zlib here, or just use 
`LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB`?
2. Should I post a patch rewriting this little zlib bit to reuse libLLVMSupport?
3. Should I look into merging libcompression support into libLLVMSupport?

> 
> 
>>   tools/debugserver/source/RNBRemote.cpp
> 
> Debugserver does not use llvm on purpose, but that should only worry you if 
> your targetting darwin.
> 
> In any case, lgtm.

Thanks, merged.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D41725



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to