On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:18 AM Stephane Sezer via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> > > The other alternative seems a bit less explicit to me but I don't mind it > too much. What's the issue with using `std::any_of` exactly? > > In the sense of correctness, nothing is wrong with using std::any_of. But if there's more than one way to do it, and one is easier to read / understand, I just prefer it. I'm not blocking the CL or anything, it was just a suggestion in the interest of readability.
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
