davide added a comment. Yes, what Zachary said. Thanks for the cleanup. There's a decent amount of code in lldb that can be written in a very compact way but it's manually unrolled. I think in this case the code produced should be equivalent (and if not, I'd be curious to see the codegen). More generally, whenever a function is not in a hot loop, we might consider preferring readability over performances anyway.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40537 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
