On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:14 AM Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote:
> > The amount of test coverage lldb has at present has much more to do with > the very aggressive schedules lldb has been driven by since its inception > than any difficulties with writing tests IMHBSEO. > This probably applies to the folks at Apple, but I think there's a large disconnect between what you guys experience and what the rest of the LLVM community (and external contributors) experience. I think this is the opposite of true for everyone else. I've heard it time and time again from long-time LLVM developers as well as would-be contributors.
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits