dwblaikie wrote: Oh, yeah, GCC doesn't produce DW_TAG_template_type_parameter for unnamed template type parameters - yeah, it'd be a valid size optimization for them (relying on the uniqueness/identity of the DW_AT_name, I guess, for any type equivalence checking) - anything that can pull in more types into DWARF can be quite expensive (pulling in a whole type subgraph) so I could totally believe they did this for size optimization reasons.
We (Clang/LLVM) don't put any DW_TAG_template_type_parameters on (non-defining) declarations of template entities - except on SCE and when using Simplified Template Names. But we do put them all on for definitions, whether or not they're named/used. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164251 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
