DrSergei wrote: I am not sure that there is a reliable approach here so it may be better to have two ways to get data type. The current solution works both for gcc and clang on my laptop, but it might depend on the compiler version. I found an old [review](https://reviews.llvm.org/D14358) where mentioned that omitting certain fields can be an intentional debug info optimization. I suspect GCC developers may have the same intention. This [bug](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66116) was already submitted to GCC, but there has been no feedback.
Failed AArch64 pipeline is not caused by this patch. It looks like there is a problem with infrastructure. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164251 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
