================
@@ -188,7 +188,74 @@ AddressClass ObjectFileXCOFF::GetAddressClass(addr_t
file_addr) {
return AddressClass::eUnknown;
}
-void ObjectFileXCOFF::ParseSymtab(Symtab &lldb_symtab) {}
+lldb::SymbolType MapSymbolType(llvm::object::SymbolRef::Type sym_type) {
+ if (sym_type == llvm::object::SymbolRef::ST_Function)
+ return lldb::eSymbolTypeCode;
+ else if (sym_type == llvm::object::SymbolRef::ST_Data)
+ return lldb::eSymbolTypeData;
+ else if (sym_type == llvm::object::SymbolRef::ST_File)
+ return lldb::eSymbolTypeSourceFile;
+ return lldb::eSymbolTypeInvalid;
+}
+
+void ObjectFileXCOFF::ParseSymtab(Symtab &lldb_symtab) {
+ SectionList *sectionList = GetSectionList();
+
+ for (const auto &symbol_ref : m_binary->symbols()) {
+ llvm::object::XCOFFSymbolRef xcoff_sym_ref(symbol_ref);
+ llvm::Expected<llvm::StringRef> name_or_err = xcoff_sym_ref.getName();
+ if (!name_or_err) {
+ consumeError(name_or_err.takeError());
+ continue;
+ }
+ llvm::StringRef symbolName = name_or_err.get();
+ // Remove the dot prefix for demangle
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:
This dot prefix is what exactly, is it an expectation of XCOFF in general?
Seems like only some symbols will have it.
You say "for demangle" but it's not clear where that happens or if you mean
remove it so that some other thing later can do it. If it does happen in this
function perhaps clarify:
```
// Remove the dot prefix so that we can demangle it.
```
Now the link between action and purpose is clearer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141577
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
