================
@@ -153,10 +173,37 @@ constexpr llvm::StringRef lookupStrings[] = {
"${target.file.fullpath}",
"${var.dummy-var-to-test-wildcard}"};
-TEST(FormatEntity, LookupAllEntriesInTree) {
+TEST_F(FormatEntityTest, LookupAllEntriesInTree) {
for (const llvm::StringRef testString : lookupStrings) {
Entry e;
EXPECT_TRUE(FormatEntity::Parse(testString, e).Success())
<< "Formatting " << testString << " did not succeed";
}
}
+
+TEST_F(FormatEntityTest, Scope) {
+ // Scope with one alternative.
+ EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED(Format("{${frame.pc}|foo}"), HasValue("foo"));
+
+ // Scope with multiple alternatives.
+ EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED(Format("{${frame.pc}|${function.name}|foo}"),
+ HasValue("foo"));
+
+ // Escaped pipe inside a scope.
+ EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED(Format("{foo\\|bar}"), HasValue("foo|bar"));
+
+ // Unescaped pipe outside a scope.
+ EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED(Format("foo|bar"), HasValue("foo|bar"));
+
+ // Nested scopes. Note that scopes always resolve.
+ EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED(Format("{{${frame.pc}|foo}|{bar}}"), HasValue("foo"));
+ EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED(Format("{{${frame.pc}}|{bar}}"), HasValue(""));
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
Oh so within `{${frame.pc}}`, `${frame.pc}` would fail, but the entire scope is
seen as "successfully resolved"? Hence it doesn't fall back to the other scope?
Does that mean the fallback can't ever be used between scopes?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137751
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
