JDevlieghere wrote: @labath this ended up quite different from the bash-like syntax that we discussed at EuroLLVM [1]. Using a single character keeps the parsing code simple and limiting this to scopes eliminates some design complexity like recursion. The current implementation covers all of my uses cases and I think you can almost (?) always use a scope when you want to have an alternative value. Please let me know what you think.
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137408#issuecomment-2834705929 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137751 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
